https://dovevn.com/

In Tense Meeting, Trump Officials Debate How to Process Migrant Families

Undocumented migrants waiting for asylum hearings on Wednesday in Tijuana, Mexico. The House delayed a vote on an immigration proposal, punting the bill to next week.

WASHINGTON — Tense arguments broke out at the White House over the past two days as top government officials clashed over how to carry out President Trump’s executive order on keeping together immigrant families at the Mexican border, according to four people familiar with the meetings.

The disputes started Thursday night. They continued Friday as Kevin K. McAleenan, the commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, returned to the White House to question how his agency was supposed to detain parents and children together when the law requires that children not be held indefinitely in jail.

The bureaucratic battles threatened to undermine Mr. Trump as his administration tries to counter a political crisis driven by heartbreaking images and recordings of crying migrant children separated from their parents and sent off to shelters.

On Friday, the president was defiant. “We cannot allow our Country to be overrun by illegal immigrants as the Democrats tell their phony stories of sadness and grief,” Mr. Trump said on Twitter.

But inside the White House, the arguments echoed the chaos at American airports after Mr. Trump’s ban on travel from predominantly Muslim countries. The ban, issued days after he took office, surprised Border Patrol agents and State Department consular officials.

Officials at the southwestern border are struggling to obey Mr. Trump’s demand to prosecute people who illegally enter the United States — ending what the president has reviled as a “catch and release” policy — while also following an executive order he issuedWednesday to keep migrant families together as they are processed in courts.

But as with the case of the travel ban, the reality of a vastly complicated bureaucratic system is colliding head-on with Mr. Trump’s shoot-from-the-hip use of executive power.

The president’s whiplash-inducing order caught several people by surprise. Just a day before Mr. Trump signed it, one person close to the president said that he told advisers that separating families at the border was the best deterrent to illegal immigration and that he said that “my people love it.”

Even on Wednesday, Mr. Trump repeatedly changed his mind about precisely what he wanted to do, and how, until shortly before he signed the order.

Video
bars
0:00/2:57
-2:57

transcript

What Options Does the U.S. Have on Immigration?

The Times’s White House correspondent Michael D. Shear examines the polarizing political debate over immigration policies in the United States.

We’ve been in the middle of this really intense debate over what to do with the borders of our country and how to deal with the questions of: Who gets to come into our country? How do they come in? Where do they go? What happens to them when they get here? And you’ve had these two really interesting extremes that have been battling for the last several decades, frankly. You’ve had a kind of, one extreme, which is in the White House right now: President Trump; Stephen Miller, his top adviser; Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “We don’t want people coming in.” “Don’t you have kids, Mr. President?” And you have the other extreme, where you have people who, you know, argue for much more liberal open borders, be much more opening to refugees, to asylum seekers. What sort of climaxed this week with this family separation crisis is, How do you find a solution that’s in the middle? The executive order essentially says the administration is now going to detain families that come across the border illegally, and they’re seeking legal permission to detain them permanently. If they can’t get that legal permission, which, right now, rests in the hands of a single federal judge in California, how does the administration handle these families? Well, there’s a couple of different solutions that have been out there in the past. The Obama administration used ankle bracelets extensively. They set up these pilot programs where the families would be put in touch, would have to register with a nonprofit organization, with a community-based organization that kept tabs on the families. The rate at which the people who are in those programs actually came back for their court hearings was very, very high, in the 90 percents, which suggested that if you could create some of these programs on a national scale, and really broaden them out, that you could potentially satisfy President Trump’s concerns about these people just melting away into the country and never coming back. So there are two big parts to the president’s executive order: What’s going to happen with people going forward? And then the question that has arisen: What’s going to happen to the people, the children, who have already been separated from their parents over these last several weeks? On that second question, the executive order is actually silent. It says nothing about the existing population of about 2,300 children who have been already separated from their parents. There are huge practical hurdles to bringing all of these people back, the main one of which is that the parents are being held in custody for criminal proceedings. They can either let the families go, using ankle bracelets, using community-based programs — that’s the way that Obama did it, that’s the way that Bush did it, that’s one option. Or, the other option would be to go back to family separation.

Video player loading
The Times’s White House correspondent Michael D. Shear examines the polarizing political debate over immigration policies in the United States.CreditCredit...John Moore/Getty Images

Thursday night’s meeting was held in the White House Situation Room and lasted at least 90 minutes, according to four officials briefed on the discussion who described it on the condition of anonymity.

They said Customs and Border Protection officials forcefully argued that agents who are apprehending migrant families at the border cannot refer all of the adults for prosecution because the Justice Department and other law enforcement agencies do not have the resources to process each case.

In particular, the border officials expressed concern about the number of prosecutors and judges needed to handle the proceedings, and the lack of space available to detain families while the cases go forward.

As a result, the officials from Customs and Border Protection told White House and Justice Department officials that they have had to issue fewer prosecution referrals of adults with children despite the president’s “zero tolerance” policy on illegal immigration.

Justice Department officials shot back, maintaining that the department has made no changes to its hard-line stance on illegal border crossings as it continues to receive referrals for prosecutions from Customs and Border Protection agents.

Government lawyers will “prosecute adults who cross our border illegally instead of claiming asylum at any port of entry,” Sarah Isgur Flores, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said Thursday in a statement.

The Justice Department has been combating reports about its ability or willingness to enact the zero-tolerance policy, denying that prosecutors have dismissed immigration violation cases in South Texas. Last month, Attorney General Jeff Sessions sent 35 prosecutors to the southwestern border to help handle the surge in cases created by the zero-tolerance policy; the Defense Department deployed an additional 21 lawyers to handle immigration prosecutions.

Federal immigration courts faced a backlog of more than 700,000 cases in May, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, or TRAC, at Syracuse University. In some courts, the average wait for an immigration hearing was over 1,400 days; some hearings are being scheduled beyond 2021 before an available slot on the docket is found.

Lt. Col. Jamie Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said the military is preparing to shelter as many as 20,000 migrant children on four bases: Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas; Fort Bliss in El Paso; Goodfellow Air Force Base in San Angelo, Tex.; and Dyess Air Force Base near Abilene, Tex. It was not immediately clear on Friday if the parents could also be housed there.

Customs and Border Protection officials said Friday that nearly 500 children who were separated since May have been reunited or will be reunited with their families by Sunday. These children were in the agency’s custody, never having been sent to facilities run by the Health and Human Services Department.

It is unclear when the other 2,300 children will be reunited with their families. They have been separated from their parents since the zero-tolerance policy was announced. The children have been placed in facilities run by the Health and Human Services Department, some of them thousands of miles from where their parents are being detained.

Administration officials said they have finalized a process to let parents know where their children are and to have regular communication with them after separation. Parents who are deported will be reunited with their children before being removed from the country, officials said.

For the past week, Mr. Trump has demanded changes in the United States’ immigration laws and encouraged Congress to act with urgency. But on Friday morning, he appeared to give up hope that the Republican-controlled Congress could succeed in passing an immigration bill this year, urging lawmakers in a tweet to stop “wasting their time.”

The president said a vote on immigration legislation should be postponed until after the midterm elections in November, when he expects Republicans to pick up more seats and create a stronger majority — a prediction that is far from guaranteed.

But House Republicans are moving forward as planned with efforts to pass immigration legislation, said Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the majority whip.

“I think the president’s expressing his frustration that Democrats don’t want to solve the problem while we do,” Mr. Scalise said. “We’re going to keep working to try to get it done.”

He acknowledged that passing the bill would be an “uphill fight.”

On Thursday, the House voted against a hard-line immigration measure, and Republican leaders delayed a vote on a more moderate proposal, punting a decision on the bill to next week to give themselves more time to pick up support.

The proposal, the product of weeks of negotiations between House Republican moderates and conservatives, would provide a citizenship path for the young unauthorized immigrants known as Dreamers and would keep migrant families together when they are stopped at the border.

But Mr. Trump’s message swiftly undercut party leaders as they try to build enough support to pass the bill.

Speaker Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin had no immediate comment on Friday about the president’s change of course.

“It doesn’t help, I’ll be honest,” said Representative Joe L. Barton, Republican of Texas. “What we wanted was the president to say, ‘Vote yes next week on the compromise bill.’”

Some rank-and-file Republicans — especially those who face tough re-election campaigns — are under intense pressure from constituents to pass legislation that would protect Dreamers, who have been shielded from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, that Mr. Trump moved to end last year.

“I think it’s time for Congress to stand up and actually write a permanent legislative fix for DACA; it’s time for us to prevent this notion of taking babies from their mothers; it’s time that we should make sure we actually secure our borders,” said Representative Will Hurd, Republican of Texas, who has been pushing a bipartisan immigration bill that Mr. Ryan refuses to take up.

Debate over the family separation policy turned into a tense standoff in the House on Friday, when Representative Ted Lieu, Democrat of California, played a recording of the detained children wailing and crying, as the presiding officer, Representative Karen Handel, Republican of Georgia, tried to shut him down.

“The gentleman will suspend,” Ms. Handel demanded repeatedly, citing the chamber’s decorum rules. Mr. Lieu refused.

“Why are you trying to prevent the American people from listening to what it sounds like in a detention facility?” Mr. Lieu asked. The recording ran for several minutes before he stopped it and yielded.

Later Friday, Mr. Trump invited family members of those killed by undocumented immigrants to deliver personal stories about the deaths of their loved ones. Some died in car accidents. Others were raped, beaten or tortured before they were killed.

“I’m one of your legal immigrants,” said Sabine Durden, whose son Dominic was killed in a crash. Mr. Trump introduced her by saying her story was an “incredible” one.

Flanked by the so-called angel families, the president said the families had been “permanently separated,” a reference to the family separation issue.

He also used the opportunity to insist that crime among illegal immigrants is higher than the news media acknowledges. In fact, a 2015 study concludes that legal and illegal immigrants are “much less likely than natives to commit crimes.”

In Other News

© 2020 US News. All Rights Reserved.