Did the #MeToo Movement Sway the Cosby Jury?

Andrea Constand after testifying on Wednesday. A jury on Thursday convicted Bill Cosby of three counts of aggravated indecent assault against Ms. Constand.

The trial of Bill Cosby provides what social scientists might call a natural experiment. In the spring of 2017, a jury could not agree on whether Mr. Cosby had drugged and sexually assaulted Andrea Constand, setting the stage for a retrial.

But between that trial and this one came the revelations over Harvey Weinstein and a cascade of other powerful men that invigorated the #MeToo movement. The big question: would it make any difference?

It well may have. The jury deliberated not even two days — compared with six days the first time around — before finding Mr. Cosby guilty on all counts.

There were other key differences: Jurors saw a new defense witness, who testified that Ms. Constand had said it would be easy to use fabricated abuse claims to extort a celebrity.

And they saw more evidence of a pattern of predatory behavior that extended beyond Ms. Constand: The judge allowed five of Mr. Cosby’s more than 50 accusers to testify, compared with one at the first trial. But some have suggested that the judge’s decision was also a response to shifting social views after #MeToo.

Jurors, male and female alike, have been notoriously reluctant to convict in sexual misconduct cases, particularly when the accused is significantly more powerful than the victim, or when the victim is poor or a member of a minority group, prosecutors and other jury experts say.

Juries tend to focus on two main issues: One, whether they believe the accuser, and two, whether the sexual behavior was consensual.

The question of consent gets particular scrutiny when the victim previously knew the accused, which is the case in the majority of sexual assaults. In a series of mock jury trials in England in 2013, many jurors said that acquaintance rapes were “less clear cut” and “more difficult to prove” than rapes by strangers.

Especially in cases that hinge on he-said-she-said evidence, a jury must not only believe the victim, said Deborah Tuerkheimer, a law professor at Northwestern University and former prosecutor, but they must also be able to imagine themselves or someone close to them in her shoes.

“Do we care? Do we think this is serious? Do we think this is worth a conviction?” she said.

Jurors frequently scrutinize such issues as whether or not the victim fought back, whether she has the injuries to prove it, whether she had been drinking or whether she had done anything to signal her consent. If the victim did not physically resist, even if she was fearful or incapacitated, one study showed she was more likely to be viewed as a willing participant. Jurors also doubted victims who did not show emotion on the stand.

After the first Cosby trial, a male juror — quoted anonymously by The Philadelphia Inquirer — said: “Let’s face it: She went up to his house with a bare midriff and incense and bath salts. What the heck?”

Angelina Jolie, Gwyneth Paltrow, Uma Thurman: The voices of some of the world’s most famous women accusing Harvey Weinstein, the powerful Hollywood producer, of serial sexual misconduct over a period of decades convinced some people that the women had nothing to gain — and much to lose — by lying about Mr. Weinstein, who has denied committing any crime.

Their stories, along with those of much less famous women, made it plain how powerful men have been able to get away with such criminal behavior and shed light on the many reasons victims might choose to remain silent, including both explicit and implicit threats to their careers and reputations.

The women also gained traction through sheer numbers, with accounts that were precise, detailed and fit a pattern.

But Melissa M. Gomez, a jury expert and author of the book, “Jury Trials Outside In,” said her research showed that the #MeToo movement has been polarizing, hardening the position of both those who believe sexual misconduct complaints are not taken seriously enough and those who are skeptical of accusers or think they somehow “asked for it.”

“#MeToo does not erase that,” she said. “They’re not going to change their mind.”

The sentencing of Dr. Lawrence G. Nassar earlier this year was the first high-profile case to unfold in a court of law after the emergence of #MeToo.

It showed the danger of official inaction: The silencing or sidelining of those who tried to report his misconduct allowed him to get away with assaulting girls and young women under his care for decades.

But at his sentencing, victims were allowed to tell their stories, under the imprimatur of a judge who called them “heroes.”

The critical element, experts say, was that Dr. Nassar had left behind far too many victims for people to simply ignore.

In all, more than 160 teenagers and women said Dr. Nassar abused them.

“The most powerful cases are where there are multiple accusers,” Ms. Gomez said. “But what we don’t know is what impact #MeToo would have on a single accuser.”

There are also concerns that juries may come to expect strong evidence of a pattern, the same way they have come to expect advanced forensics like DNA testing, even though it is not always available.

“If it’s the case where there are 60 accusers and six come forward — and that’s the only way a case is brought — that’s a problem,” Ms. Tuerkheimer said. “There’s the appearance that for women to be believed, it couldn’t be just one, it had to be many.”

Though the jury took very little time to find Mr. Cosby guilty, Michelle Dempsey, a law professor at Villanova University, cautioned that the verdict should not be regarded as a litmus test for #MeToo, but simply as a jury’s decision in a single case.

More important, she said, is that the case is part of a shift in what she calls the “norms of accountability.” People can discuss abuse on Twitter, while many companies have beefed up harassment training.

“It’s not just a matter of taking people to court,” Dr. Dempsey said. “We’re recognizing that there’s lots of ways to hold people accountable for sexual harassment and sexual violence.”

In Other News

fake money

Keywords clouds text link http://alonhatro.com

 máy sấy   thịt bò mỹ  thành lập doanh nghiệp
Visunhomegương trang trí  nội thất  cửa kính cường lực   lắp camera Song Phát thiết kế nhà 

Our PBN System:  thiết kế nhà xưởng thiết kế nội thất thiết kế nhà tem chống giả  https://thegioiapple.net/ https://24hstore.vn/

aviatorsgame.com ban nhạcconfirmationbiased.com 
mariankihogo.com  ốp lưngGiường ngủ triệu gia  Ku bet ku casino

https://maysayhaitan.com/  https://dovevn.com/ buy fake money https://sgnexpress.vn/ máy sấy buồn sấy lạnh

mặt nạ  mặt nạ ngủ  Mặt nạ môi mặt nạ bùn mặt nạ kem mặt nạ bột mặt nạ tẩy tế bào chết  mặt nạ đất sét mặt nạ giấy mặt nạ dưỡng mặt nạ đắp mặt  mặt nạ trị mụn
mặt nạ tế bào gốc mặt nạ trị nám tem chống giả

https://galaxymedia.vn/  công ty tổ chức sự kiện tổ chức sự kiện
Ku bet ku casino
Sâm tươi hàn quốc trần thạch cao trần thạch cao đẹp

suất ăn công nghiệpcung cấp suất ăn công nghiệp


© 2020 US News. All Rights Reserved.